Trail Scout
How are Trail Scout routes reviewed?
Short answer
Every submitted trail must be walked independently by a different scout before it can go anywhere. Their walk is checked against the original — did they reach the checkpoints, does the timing make sense — and then a person decides whether it publishes. There is no automatic publication.
Updated · 3 min read
The second walk
A different scout walks the route and records their own evidence. The service compares the two: whether the checkpoints were actually reached, whether the walk is plausible as a walk, whether the evidence supports the claim.
A scout cannot verify their own trail. That is enforced rather than requested.

The human decision
Passing verification does not publish anything. It puts the trail in front of a person, who approves, asks for changes, or rejects it. That final gate is deliberate and permanent — an automated pipeline that published trails would eventually publish a bad one into somebody's evening walk.

After publication
Published trails are re-walked periodically to check they still match reality, and anyone can report a problem with one. A trail that turns out to be wrong can be withdrawn quickly.

Related guides
- How do published trails appear in Walkable?Approved trails are gathered into a catalogue that Walkable reads.
- What is Trail Scout?A separate companion app for people who walk routes into existence and document them.
- How can I become a Trail Scout?Install Trail Scout and submit a trail. There is no application and no account.
Was this helpful?
Nothing is sent or recorded — this only changes what you see next.
Feedback about the guide: How are Trail Scout routes reviewed?Still stuck? Contact Walkable Support or ask the Community.